I'm migrating my Bacula director and DB to a new server with much more CPU horsepower, leaving the storage daemons where they are. Right now, both directors are running and working. But.......
The obvious safe move here is to stop the OLD Director for tonight and let the new one carry the job and see how it does. But I'm curious. Does anyone know what will happen (maximum concurrent jobs limits being stipulated to be Not An Issue) if two Directors attempt to run the same Jobs on the same Clients to the same Storage using the same Catalog at the same time? (The DB servers are replicating master-master, but to make life safer I can point the old Director at the new DB server anyway.) I'm not planning to actually try this, but I'm curious to know whether anyone has ever tried a corner case like this one, and if so, what happened. -- Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355 ala...@caerllewys.net ala...@metrocast.net p...@co.ordinate.org Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, SQL wrangler, Free Stater It's not the years, it's the mileage. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users