Zitat von John Drescher <dresche...@gmail.com>: > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:35 AM, <lst_ho...@kwsoft.de> wrote: >> >> Zitat von John Drescher <dresche...@gmail.com>: >> >>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Pubudu Perera >>> <suharsha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Thank John! >>>> So, that means there's no way to does the job simultaneously ? >>>> >>> You could run 2 concurrent jobs (one to each storage) but that would >>> cause 2 times the load on your client. >>> >>> John >> >> But not with Windows Clients and VSS enabled. With this only one job >> at a time is started and subsequent jobs have to wait until the first >> finish :-( >> > > For that you may (depending on your setup) be able to work around the > bug/issue by dividing your fileset up to the part that needs VSS and > all the rest and then run 4 jobs instead of 2. > > John
Hmm, looks like a single VSS job block all others regardless if they use VSS or not. So one have to create a (small) VSS job and isolate them from all others :-( Thanks for the hint Andreas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
