On 09/25/2012 11:17 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:00:07 -0700 > Stephen Thompson <step...@seismo.berkeley.edu> wrote: > >>> 60Mb/s is _slow_ for LTO3. You need to take a serious look at what >>> you're using as stage disk and consider using a raid0 array of SSDs >>> in order to keep up. >> Why do you say that's slow when the max speed appears to be 80? >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_Tape-Open > It's quite logical, that to not starve the consumer, the producer > should be at least as fast or faster, so you have to provide at least > 80 Mb/s sustained read rate from your spooling media to be sure the > tape drive is kept busy. >
No, I mean, there's slow and there's __SLOW__. He seemed to be indicating that it was unacceptably slow. I understand it's not optimal. Stephen -- Stephen Thompson Berkeley Seismological Laboratory step...@seismo.berkeley.edu 215 McCone Hall # 4760 404.538.7077 (phone) University of California, Berkeley 510.643.5811 (fax) Berkeley, CA 94720-4760 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
