> 
> Hello
> 
> we tested a restore on a somewhat larger jobs (Windows 2003 client) with
> the following result:
> 
> 10-Sep 21:28 bacula-test-dir JobId 116: Error: Bacula bacula-test-dir
> 5.2.10 (28Jun12):
>    Build OS:               x86_64-pc-linux-gnu ubuntu 12.04
>    JobId:                  116
>    Job:                    RestoreFiles.2012-09-10_16.53.15_09
>    Restore Client:         xpression-fd
>    Start time:             10-Sep-2012 16:53:17
>    End time:               10-Sep-2012 21:28:33
>    Files Expected:         565,485
>    Files Restored:         565,485
>    Bytes Restored:         241,268,365,509
>    Rate:                   14608.2 KB/s
>    FD Errors:              343
>    FD termination status:  Error
>    SD termination status:  OK
>    Termination:            *** Restore Error ***
> 
> 
> The 343 errors are all but one of the following:
> 
> 10-Sep 20:27 xpression-fd JobId 116: Error: filed/restore.c:1475 Write error
> on h:/g/tmp/Service/eclipse_training_dvd/Uebungsmaterial/Kapitel
> 09/Lektion 09.03/: Zugriff verweigert
> 
> Strange enough the files are all there and i can't find any special 
> permissions
> on them.
> 
> Bacula is 5.2.10 on Server and client, OS is Windows 2003 32-Bit.
> 
> Any idea what is worng with these files?
> 

I find process monitor from sysinternals.com very useful for debugging stuff 
like this. You should be able to filter it on that file/directory to just give 
you the records you are interested in.

James


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to