On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 02:26:51PM +0800, d tbsky wrote: > 2012/8/5 Phil Stracchino <ala...@metrocast.net> > > > On 08/05/12 05:57, d tbsky wrote: > > >First of all note that 5.2.10 is a considerably more recent version than > > >2.0.0, and does nut therefore fall under "until 2.0.0". :) This should > > >answer your question... > > > > but I didn't see any change log about this in the document. so I think > maybe the situation is the same > even I am using 5.2.10? > I wonder anyone use large disk volumes for backup? > thanks a lot for help!!
In a way, yes, but we're not happy with it because of the extremely long recycle times. Most of our backups run on the weekend, so as a consequence or volume for that day is rather big and I've begun moving large and / or long-running backups to their own pools / devices / storages. Still, recycling the volume takes around five hours, so if I'd have to start from scratch again, I'd set up separate pools etc. from the beginning. (volume size currently ranges from 500G to 1,4T). If anyone has any ideas how to reduce the volume size while increasing the number of volumes *without* having to constantly fiddle with the maximum volumes in the pool definition as clients get added and removed, I'm all ears. All the best, Uwe -- NIONEX --- Ein Unternehmen der Bertelsmann AG ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
