On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 08:09:38PM -0600, NetCetera Lists wrote: > I am working on setting up a Copy job to a tape autoloader - and am > having an issue with the Next Pool directive requirement. > > I am picking the jobs to copy - last Full for a number of existing > clients - using an SQL Query. > > The query is working fine and providing the correct job ids as input. > > The problem is that each client has its own Pool - containing Fulls, > Incrementals and Differentials - and I don't know how to > work around the Next Pool requirement... > > I would rather use 1 job for all the copies if possible and would don't > really want to revamp the Pools so that the fulls etc have their own pools. > > Anyone have any ideas ? > > Thanks >
Hi, some of our clients (mostly long-running backups) have their own pools as well, but this shouldn't be a problem if all your tapes are in a separate, single pool, or am I misunderstanding your question here? We're using a single query for all copy jobs and it appears to work fine. All the best, Uwe -- uwe.schuerk...@nionex.net fon: [+49] 5242.91 - 4740, fax:-69 72 Hauptsitz: Avenwedder Str. 55, D-33311 Gütersloh, Germany Registergericht Gütersloh HRB 4196, Geschäftsführer: H. Gosewehr, D. Suda NIONEX --- Ein Unternehmen der Bertelsmann AG ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
