On 14.04.2012 13:26, Timo Neuvonen wrote: > Yes, I know that the Bacula Release Notes say "As always, both the Director > and Storage daemon must be upgraded at the same time." > > Is this because of some shared library versions or something else "single > host environment"- related? > > I'm migrating my old CentOS 5.x-32 system with Bacula 5.0.3, to CentOS > 6.2-64, with Bacula 5.2.6. > > I'm very tempted to have an intermediate step (for just a few days) with > the old storage (running in the old hw) and the new director (in the new > hw). > > So both the director and storage would be of 5-generation with different > minor numbers, and everything running in any single host, would be of > exactly the same version. Any chance this combination might work? > > Of course, as long as I had that cocktail in use, I wouldn't touch the conf > files for no other reason but to edit machine names where necessary. So no > attempt to use any new features... if the communication protocols between > the daemons haven't changed, I guess there shouln't be anything > wrong -unless the daemons explicitly check the version info. Hi.
Why would you like to have different versions of DIR and SD installed on the same machine? -- Silver ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
