Op 20120403 om 16:44 schreef Juan Diaz: > > Hello, > > > I'm trying to make a Virtual backup of a machine that I already backed-up > with a base backup and a full backup after. > > The problem is that the backup's size of the virtual backup is the same of > the full backup. Witch tell us that it is not taking the base for doing the > Virtual Backup. > > Has anybody tried it successfully? Base+full = Virtual >
Over here we use 'full' and 'incremental'. This mailinglist made me aware there is something called "Virtual full", but it is something that I don't miss. So I didn't investigate what I _might_ be missing. To me is "VirtualBackup" new and frankly I think that "VirtualBackup" is something being mistaken. Hope this Helps, Geert Stappers -- http://www.vanadplatform.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
