Am 16.03.2012 09:58, schrieb Simone Caronni: > Makes sense? > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=bacula.git;a=commitdiff;h=964c4995e7d7c6cb820ecbb4b0c4ed58b1cbb4ed
Looks good. > I removed all *sql libs in my system and tried to install client and > console, no libraries are pulled in. Very nice, thanks a lot. I'll gladly test as soon as it shows up in the repo. >> I got the point, I think that can be done without making things too >> complicated. Would it be okay if the actual list of packages would end >> up like this? >> >> bacula-client.x86_64 >> bacula-common.x86_64 >> bacula-console.x86_64 >> bacula-console-bat.x86_64 >> bacula-director.x86_64 >> bacula-docs.noarch >> bacula-libs.x86_64 <-- remove libbacsql*, libbaccats* and the alternatives >> bacula-storage.x86_64 >> >> PLUS: >> >> bacula-libs-sql.x86_64 <-- this would contain libbacsql* and >> libbaccats* required by Director and Storage Daemons That's perfectly fine. Thanks again, Tilman -- Tilman Schmidt Phoenix Software GmbH Bonn, Germany ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
