Disregard. It's flying along now at the expected speeds. I blame sun spots.
James > -----Original Message----- > From: James Harper [mailto:james.har...@bendigoit.com.au] > Sent: Monday, 17 October 2011 4:14 PM > To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [Bacula-users] performance over WAN links > > I'm revisiting a remote backup, and am troubled by the fact that Bacula > appears to be making using of only a fraction of the available > bandwidth. > > iperf tells me there is around 750KBits/second of usable TCP bandwidth > in the fd->sd direction, but Bacula only reports a Bytes/sec rate of > 30Kbytes/second which is quite removed from the ~70Kbytes/second I'd > expect. > > A tcpdump of a 30 second snapshot of the traffic shows that it isn't > buffer overhead - there really were only around 30Kbytes/second of data > transmitted. > > Any hints on how to speed this up a bit? > > Thanks > > James > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a > definitive record of customers, application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
