Hi, On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > > > I am running a very smooth bacula 5.0.3 on Fedora 14. Everything seems to > > be OK > > except restores which are incredibly slow. How can I debug it to see what's > > wrong? > > Start off by telling us what part of the restore process is slow: > > - building the file tree for selection > - the actual restore of files to disk > - something else A few minutes after replying I noticed that you asked this in more detail back in February and said that building the tree was the slow part. I have suffered similar problems with MySQL explored in the thread linked below. By logging slow queries I managed to identify a single query which was the primary cause. http://adsm.org/lists/html/Bacula-users/2010-11/msg00112.html http://adsm.org/lists/html/Bacula-users/2010-11/msg00187.html Then a couple of months ago I noticed a new detail in the wiki about _removing_ bogus indexes. It turns out that by adding extra indexes you can slow down MySQL SELECT queries (I think someone said it doesn't always choose the optimal/correct index). http://wiki.bacula.org/doku.php?id=faq http://adsm.org/lists/html/Bacula-users/2011-08/msg00004.html http://adsm.org/lists/html/Bacula-users/2011-08/msg00007.html It would be worth taking a look at that. Gavin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users