I understand and I'm in the same way. All new vm's are deployed in iSCSI
volume on QNAP nas.
Next item to my wishlist is config a physical bacula with volumes in a QNAP.
My question is, by NFS or iSCSI? Some partners told me to do in NFS, but I
think that in iSCSI is the best way...
What do you think?
Thanks,
Arnau
De: Pietro Bertera [mailto:pie...@bertera.it]
Enviado el: martes, 06 de septiembre de 2011 19:48
Para: Arnau Coll
CC: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Asunto: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula + qnap (SAN)
Hi,
2011/9/6 Arnau Coll <ac...@puntdoc.es>
Hi,
What's the best way to set up bacula with a Qnap SAN ? By NFS or iSCSI?
Thanks
I used a qnap as low-performance storage for bacula (on a VM) and others
VMs, but I have connected the qnap to
ESXi host as an iSCSI storage, end then created the virtual disks over the
new datastore.
best regards,
Pietro
--
Bertera Pietro
http://www.bertera.it
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop
What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses
from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops
provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable
virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
