Hello After enabling TLS, I've noticed significant performance drawback. I've made some tests for both Linux (Fedora 13) and Windows XP clients. I've used 250MB tar archive. One file. No compression.
BACKUP: Windows TLS 850 kB/s Windows NO_TLS 8500 kB/s Linux TLS 9274 kB/s Linux NO_TLS 10819 kB/s RESTORE: Windows TLS 5645 kB/s Windows NO_TLS 8114 kB/s Linux TLS 5409 kB/s Linux NO_TLS 5901 kB/s As you can see, Windows backup with TLS enabled is 10 times slower than backup without TLS. On Linux clients I didn't notice this problem. I checked it few times, also with other PC. During backup client CPU load was around 1%. So I don't thing it's hardware problem. I've also copied tar archive from Windows client to backup storage server (using CIFS) - 16 MB/s. Am I missing somthing? Did you have simillar problems? What can cause this slowdown? Is it normal? How can I improve performance? Thanks in advance. Kamil +---------------------------------------------------------------------- |This was sent by kamilfur...@gmail.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-d2d-2 _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
