Le 08/06/2011 19:16, Gavin McCullagh a écrit : > On Wed, 08 Jun 2011, Jérôme Blion wrote: > >> You will see performance improvements if you have lot of concurrents >> updates. > I don't imagine concurrent updates are really an issue for us. Our backups > run fast enough generally for our purposes . I daresay they could be > faster, but they're not causing us a problem. It's the time for a restore > to build the file tree that's a problem. > > The particularly bad restore in question is a Cyrus IMAP server with about > 5 million files in a full backup. The worst case would be a monthly full, > a weekly differential and 6 days of incrementals to assemble. > > Gavin What tool do you use to perform restore ? I had such issues with BAT... With Webacula, I am not able to reproduce this behaviour. Perhaps a bad query which does not use an index.
HTH. Jérôme Blion. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
