Hi people: I'm running Bacula 5.0.3 with an tape library IBM TS3100 using LTO5 tapes of 1.5 TB capacity each one. I have a simple question: If I run a job backup of a server that holds more than 1.5 TB (example: 2 TB of data), what happen when Bacula reaches the limit of the tape capacity? Does Bacula automatically change the tape?
I'm not pretty sure about this because I recently ran a job backup of 2 TB and Bacula apparently just used one tape: have a look at my volume listing: * list volume ... ... | 5 | L5BA0005 | Append | 1 | 2,058,019,117,056 | 2,059 | 2,160,000 | 1 | 5 | 1 | LTO-5 | 2011-04-19 20:58:51 | +---------+------------+-----------+---------+-------------------+----------+--------------+---------+------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+ When the job started Bacula took the tape L5BA0005 and never required another one. As you can see Bacula apparently wrote 2,058,019,117,056 bytes (approx. 2 TB) but my tape is just 1.5 TB capacity. Does anybody know why? My job isn't using compression so I really don't understand this. Just for additional information there are a lot of new tapes on my magazines. Have a look at this: * list volume Pool: Scratch +---------+------------+-----------+---------+----------+----------+--------------+---------+------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+ | MediaId | VolumeName | VolStatus | Enabled | VolBytes | VolFiles | VolRetention | Recycle | Slot | InChanger | MediaType | LastWritten | +---------+------------+-----------+---------+----------+----------+--------------+---------+------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+ | 6 | L5BA0006 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0 | 31,536,000 | 1 | 6 | 1 | LTO-5 | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | | 7 | L5BA0007 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0 | 31,536,000 | 1 | 7 | 1 | LTO-5 | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | | 8 | L5BA0008 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0 | 31,536,000 | 1 | 8 | 1 | LTO-5 | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | | 12 | L5BA0001 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0 | 31,536,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | LTO-5 | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | | 13 | L5BA0009 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0 | 31,536,000 | 1 | 9 | 1 | LTO-5 | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | | 14 | L5BA0010 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0 | 31,536,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | LTO-5 | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | | 15 | L5BA0011 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0 | 31,536,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | LTO-5 | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | | 16 | L5BA0012 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0 | 31,536,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | LTO-5 | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | | 17 | L5BA0013 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0 | 31,536,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | LTO-5 | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | | 18 | L5BA0014 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0 | 31,536,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | LTO-5 | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | | 19 | L5BA0015 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0 | 31,536,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | LTO-5 | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | | 20 | L5BA0016 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0 | 31,536,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | LTO-5 | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | | 21 | L5BA0017 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0 | 31,536,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | LTO-5 | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | | 22 | L5BA0018 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0 | 31,536,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | LTO-5 | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | | 23 | L5BA0019 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0 | 31,536,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | LTO-5 | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | | 24 | L5BA0020 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0 | 31,536,000 | 1 | 0 | 0 | LTO-5 | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 | +---------+------------+-----------+---------+----------+----------+--------------+---------+------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+ So I don't know why Bacula didn't take a free tape of Scratch pool. I hope someone can help me to understand this Bacula behavior. Thanks, bye. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users