On 4/19/2011 10:21 AM, hymie! wrote: > Marcello Romani writes: > >> Maybe it's not relevant to your case, but have you tried to enable >> spooling ? > I don't think spooling will solve my problem. First off, I'm using disks > as my storage, not tapes; spooling is not recommended. Second, the > bottleneck clearly (well, clearly to me) is at the client side choosing > files. Note that Bytes/sec is under 8,000. I don't have any currently- > running backups to compare it to, but that seems like an *extremely* low > number.
You should still spool attributes, though. Those zillions of files cause zillions of database writes. This can dramatically improve database write performance. Also, try turning off compression. Compression is performed on the client, so could potentially slow the client's throughput rate, particularly an old or otherwise relatively low performance client. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
