> Both full and differential backup run with same speed. Going through > filesystem shouldn't affect backup speed. Rsync (which I used for > testing) is doing pretty much same job - compares checksum of each and > every file and transfers it if its different. Its 50 times faster than > Bacula doing same job (50 MB/s against 1 MB/s). Unless Bacula is doing > something more than simply comparing md5 checksums it should run at > comparable speed or I'm missing something...
Out of interest, which filesystem are you using on this volume? Vennlige hilsener / Best regards roy -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (+47) 97542685 r...@karlsbakk.net http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/ -- I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og relevante synonymer på norsk. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gaining the trust of online customers is vital for the success of any company that requires sensitive data to be transmitted over the Web. Learn how to best implement a security strategy that keeps consumers' information secure and instills the confidence they need to proceed with transactions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
