On 04-01-2011 15:11, Dan Langille wrote: > On Tue, January 4, 2011 7:55 am, Tom Sommer wrote: >> On Tue, January 4, 2011 12:59, Dan Langille wrote: >>> On 1/4/2011 5:00 AM, Tom Sommer wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, January 4, 2011 03:15, Dan Langille wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 1/3/2011 12:57 PM, Tom Sommer wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I'm currently restoring 1.5 mill. files and it's taking forever. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> bacula-sd is using 100% CPU, disk IO is apparently low, so I assume >>>>>> it's a CPU issue. >>>>>> >>>>>> My machine has 16GB RAM and 2 CPUs: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> top - 18:54:53 up 75 days, 10:16, 3 users, load average: 1.00, >>>>>> 1.00, >>>>>> 1.00 >>>>>> Tasks: 172 total, 1 running, 171 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie >>>>>> Cpu0 : 85.3%us, 1.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 12.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, >>>>>> 1.0%si, >>>>>> 0.0%st >>>>>> Cpu1 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, >>>>>> 0.0%si, >>>>>> 0.0%st >>>>>> Cpu2 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, >>>>>> 0.0%si, >>>>>> 0.0%st >>>>>> Cpu3 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, >>>>>> 0.0%si, >>>>>> 0.0%st >>>>>> Cpu4 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, >>>>>> 0.0%si, >>>>>> 0.0%st >>>>>> Cpu5 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, >>>>>> 0.0%si, >>>>>> 0.0%st >>>>>> Cpu6 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, >>>>>> 0.0%si, >>>>>> 0.0%st >>>>>> Cpu7 : 11.9%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 88.1%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, >>>>>> 0.0%si, >>>>>> 0.0%st >>>>>> Mem: 16429812k total, 16345744k used, 84068k free, 1272k >>>>>> buffers Swap: 3124632k total, 184k used, 3124448k free, >>>>>> 5690688k >>>>>> cached >>>>>> >>>>>> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND >>>>>> 4014 root 18 0 109m 19m 1264 S 100.3 0.1 135:07.23 >>>>>> bacula-sd >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> As you can see the process takes 100% CPU usage, on 1 core. Is >>>>>> there any way to make Bacula use all cores? or any other way to >>>>>> speed up the restore - By the looks of it, it could take days to >>>>>> restore the data. >>>>> What stage of the restore is occurring? is it building the file >>>>> tree? Has the restore started? >>>>> >>>> It's runnning - sending the files to the server. >>>> >>>> >>>> 2 days in, it's completed 50GB of a total of ~220GB. >>>> >>>> >>>> Not really that impressive. >>>> >>>> >>>> My files are stored in blocks of 10GB. >>>> >>> Sounds like spooling or database index issues. I'm guessing you are >>> using MySQL and there are no spool options on your job / bacula-sd. >>> >>> The database index issues have been discussed previously on this list. >>> You should be able to find them. Look at that first before thinking >>> about spooling. >> I'm thinking it might be due to compression? Does that make sense? > I don't know. But FYI: the SD does not do compression. The FD does. Okay, then I'm a bit lost again.
Does the -fd also do the decompression? // Tom ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
