Hi all I'm planning a Bacula setup with ZFS on the SDs (media being disk, not tape), and I just wonder - should I use a smaller recordsize (aka largest block size) than the default setting of 128kB?
Also, last I tried, with ZFS on a test box, I enabled compression, the lzjb algorithm (very lightwegith and quite decent compression). For 'normal' data, I usually get 30%+ compression with this, but for the data backed up with bacula, it didn't look that good, compression being down to 3-5%. Any idea what might cause this? Vennlige hilsener / Best regards roy -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (+47) 97542685 r...@karlsbakk.net http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/ -- I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og relevante synonymer på norsk. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
