No, there was no data in the tape. All tapes were "label barcode" and
placed in the scratch pool. The 142GB were written by that job. Like
you said, it seems the same job is running 2 times. I ll wait and see..
Prior to starting the job:
Pool: Scratch
+---------+------------+-----------+---------+----------+----------
+--------------+---------+------+-----------+-----------
+---------------------+
| MediaId | VolumeName | VolStatus | Enabled | VolBytes | VolFiles |
VolRetention | Recycle | Slot | InChanger | MediaType |
LastWritten |
+---------+------------+-----------+---------+----------+----------
+--------------+---------+------+-----------+-----------
+---------------------+
| 1 | CNH910 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0
| 31,536,000 | 1 | 1 | 1 | tape | 0000-00-00
00:00:00 |
| 2 | CNH911 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0
| 31,536,000 | 1 | 2 | 1 | tape | 0000-00-00
00:00:00 |
| 3 | CNH912 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0
| 31,536,000 | 1 | 3 | 1 | tape | 0000-00-00
00:00:00 |
| 4 | CNH913 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0
| 31,536,000 | 1 | 4 | 1 | tape | 0000-00-00
00:00:00 |
| 5 | CNH914 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0
| 31,536,000 | 1 | 5 | 1 | tape | 0000-00-00
00:00:00 |
+---------+------------+-----------+---------+----------+----------
+--------------+---------+------+-----------+-----------
+---------------------+
After the job was ran:
Pool: Scratch
+---------+------------+-----------+---------+----------+----------
+--------------+---------+------+-----------+-----------
+---------------------+
| MediaId | VolumeName | VolStatus | Enabled | VolBytes | VolFiles |
VolRetention | Recycle | Slot | InChanger | MediaType |
LastWritten |
+---------+------------+-----------+---------+----------+----------
+--------------+---------+------+-----------+-----------
+---------------------+
| 3 | CNH912 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0
| 31,536,000 | 1 | 3 | 1 | tape | 0000-00-00
00:00:00 |
| 4 | CNH913 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0
| 31,536,000 | 1 | 4 | 1 | tape | 0000-00-00
00:00:00 |
| 5 | CNH914 | Append | 1 | 64,512 | 0
| 31,536,000 | 1 | 5 | 1 | tape | 0000-00-00
00:00:00 |
+---------+------------+-----------+---------+----------+----------
+--------------+---------+------+-----------+-----------
+---------------------+
Pool: Full-Pool-dsk-tpe
+---------+------------+-----------+---------+-----------------
+----------+--------------+---------+------+-----------+-----------
+---------------------+
| MediaId | VolumeName | VolStatus | Enabled | VolBytes |
VolFiles | VolRetention | Recycle | Slot | InChanger | MediaType |
LastWritten |
+---------+------------+-----------+---------+-----------------
+----------+--------------+---------+------+-----------+-----------
+---------------------+
| 1 | CNH910 | Full | 1 | 164,989,504,512 |
166 | 2,592,000 | 1 | 1 | 1 | tape |
2010-08-10 20:53:33 |
| 2 | CNH911 | Used | 1 | 142,552,940,544 |
143 | 2,592,000 | 1 | 2 | 1 | tape |
2010-08-11 00:53:24 |
+---------+------------+-----------+---------+-----------------
+----------+--------------+---------+------+-----------+-----------
+---------------------+
Thanks
------
Romer Ventura
On Aug 11, 2010, at 9:32 AM, John Drescher wrote:
Yes, i understand that, but when the tape CNH910 got full, bacula
unloaded
the tape and loaded CNH911, when loading the tape, bacula marked
it as
"used" before writing any data to it.
So you are saying there was 148GB of data on CNH911 before the job
started. Then bacula loaded the volume, marked it used and then
determined it could not write to a used volume so it asked for a
different volume?
John
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
