On 8/3/2010 7:09 PM, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote: > Yes, a batch insert is faster than a specfic insert, but the latter > should be done at the "written-to-tape" transaction time, and could be > done asynchronously, but in a transaction. Its pretty crazy for a>7TB > tape backup to fail because of a temporary file/table problem at the END > of the backup process rather than during it.
Perhaps this will help: * batch insert determines the method to be used. * Spool Attributes determines when this method is used. Does that help? -- Dan Langille - http://langille.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
