> Has your tape drive drive passed all the btape tests? Yes, it did. I ran the tests again, just to make sure, and it is all ok.
FWIW, this is an Arcvault48 Autochanger library with 2 HP Ultrium LTO4 drives. John May Fugro Horizons, Inc. john....@fugrohorizons.com -----Original Message----- From: Dan Langille [mailto:d...@langille.org] Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 2:17 PM To: May, John Cc: 'bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net' Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.0.2 restore files from tape very slow On 7/15/2010 3:05 PM, May, John wrote: >> Are you restoring a few files from a backup? An entire backup? > > I am restoring the entire backup, the full two tapes worth of data. If you were selecting a few files, here and there, I would look at your skip forward feature on your tape drive and ensure it was correctly configured in bacula-dir.conf. That does not apply here. >> What command did you issue? > > # bextract -c /etc/bacula/bacula-sd.conf -V 000011L4\|000021L4 /dev/nst0 > /restores Well.... again, the whole backup, so, no clues there. Has your tape drive drive passed all the btape tests? -- Dan Langille - http://langille.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
