Hi,
Please disregard this thread. Bacula is doing everything right.
Everything started with the summary showing compression rate equals zero
and the final fd bytes just a bit bigger than the sum of the file
sizes... Now that I have disabled compression completely I've noticed
that the encryption overhead is much larger than I thought it would be.
Sorry to disturb you,
Gustavo.
Gustavo Gibson da Silva wrote:
> Gustavo Gibson da Silva wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I have a bacula 5.0.2 setup that uses compression based on file
>> compression and it is working fine. Now I've decided to play with
>> encryption and I have just noticed that the files are no longer
>> compressed. Are encryption and compression mutually exclusive or do I
>> need another setup in order to make it work?
>>
> Argh,
>
> I Mean that the bacula setup decides to use compression based on the
> file extension. Sorry for the mistake.
>
> TIA,
>
> Gustavo.
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Gustavo.
>>
>
>
--
"Nam et ipsa scientia potestas est"
-- Sir Francis Bacon, 1597
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
