> > Honestly, if you have that large of a backup set and the individual > files can be in the terabyte range, you might want to reconsider whether > spooling is the correct approach. Remember, the primary purposes of > spooling are to allow a fast dump to disk of small backup sets followed > by a slower write out to tape (in order to free up clients as fast as > possible), or to prevent shoeshining when clients and/or the network > cannot transfer data fast enough to keep a high-speed tape drive streaming. >
Yes, I have enabled spooling to try and be able to do a backup as the server kept on running out of memory. It was running out of memory when I was not spooling as well. So at this point of time I have no idea what else to do. My other backups from NFS works fine which is about 600GB, it is just this 11TB that is giving me trouble. Both the 600GB and the 11TB is on the same NetApp, I do not spool the 600GB. ekke85 +---------------------------------------------------------------------- |This was sent by ekk...@gmail.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
