On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 08:22:09AM -0700, ebollengier wrote:
> I tweaked my test to compare both queries, and it shows no difference with
> and without base job part... If you want to test queries on your side with
> your data, you can download my tool (accurate-test.pl) on
> http://bacula.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=bacula/docs;a=tree;f=docs/techlogs;hb=HEAD
>
> If you can tweak my script to reproduce your problem, i would be able to fix
> things.
>
> http://old.nabble.com/file/p28166612/diff-with-without-basejob.png
I'm currently running your script to generate the test database. I think
that is going to take a long time, so I'll leave it overnight.
Meanwhile (unless I misunderstand), I think that your graph is labelled
strangely.
When I'm generating the file records, I get this:
...
JobId=10 files=200000
Insert takes 445secs for 2000000 records
...
JobId=13 files=20000
Insert takes 54secs for 200000 records
...
So, JobIds 10 + 13:
220000 files
2200000 records
Your script says:
do_bench("10,13", 2200000);
This is obviously the records number.
Your graph uses this bigger number and labels it 'Files'.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
