On 03/09/10 09:06, Matija Nalis wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:31:41AM -0500, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> Why don't you try this (I'm assuming you're backing up to disk, as you
>> didn't specify):
>>
>> Set up three Storage devices on your Storage daemon, and three Pools,
>> each tied to one of the Storage devices. So you have Pool A on Storage
>> device A, Pool B on Storage device B, Pool C on Storage device C. (They
>> can all point to the same physical disk pool. That's OK.) Assign the
>> clients from group A to use pool A, group B to pool B, group C to pool
>> C. Then set maximum concurrency to 50 on Storage C, and to 1 on Storage
>> A and B. To achieve the same effect, you could use the same basic setup
>
>
> Thanks Phil, that's a great idea !
>
> Unfortunately, we're backing up to several LTO drives, and as far as
> I've seen so far it seems that the tapes don't like being shared by
> several storage devices (or can bacula 5.x now handle that OK ?)
You're correct, you can only have one Storage device pointed at a tape
drive. So that idea won't work.
Do you have enough disk to spool A and B jobs to disk, then migrate them
to tape?
--
Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
ala...@caerllewys.net ala...@metrocast.net p...@co.ordinate.org
Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater
It's not the years, it's the mileage.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
