On 02/24/10 08:07, Silver Salonen wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 February 2010 19:09:49 Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> On 02/23/10 06:32, Silver Salonen wrote:
>>> I consider it a bug, but looks like devs do not. Any opinions?
>>
>> I ran into this problem when I first upgraded to 3.0.3. It turned out
>> to be a configuration issue. Make sure you have the desired level of
>> concurrency enabled in ALL applicable resources (i.e, you need "Maximum
>> Concurrent Jobs = 20" set for the SD both in your bacula-sd.conf file
>> AND in your bacula-dir.conf file). If you have different values set in
>> different places, the *lowest* will end up being used.
>
> Do I get it right, that you have multiple jobs using the same device
> concurrently?
Yes indeed. I back up all of my clients simultaneously, and the jobs
all run concurrently to the same storage device.
--
Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
ala...@caerllewys.net ala...@metrocast.net p...@co.ordinate.org
Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater
It's not the years, it's the mileage.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
