On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 11:13 -0600, Moray Henderson wrote:
> That's not the way you're supposed to do things with rpm. There are a
> few things that you're not supposed to do in rpm which would be quite
> convenient - and several more that rpm does which would be better done
> in other ways.
I was afraid that might be the answer. It occurred to me that the spec
might be named based on the capability it provides ("bacula") rather
than the package it installs.
> But this isn't the list to discuss that :-)
I apologize if my post was off-topic. I thought about subscribing to the
developer list, but honestly I don't feel my Bacula knowledge is yet
high enough.
Should I contact the package maintainer off-list with my proposed patch
to the spec file, rather than having posted it here?
Kind regards,
Scott
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scott D. COURTNEY, Principal Engineer Sine Nomine Associates
scourt...@sinenomine.net http://www.sinenomine.net/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
