Le Dahut,
OK, take a deep breath and sit back. Now, I can send you my config files and
anything else you need - like binaries. Let me know. I can also send you my
configure settings.
Mehma
===
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:28 AM, le dahut <le.da...@laposte.net> wrote:
> I have exactly the same :
> * vmware ESXi
> * Intel 64bit processor
> * bacula 3.0.3 from official sources, without any patch
>
> but I'm running Hardy/8.04.
>
> Did you build something else on your server or is everything out of the box
> from Ubuntu ?
>
>
> I tested Mandriva X64, bacula seems to work well.
>
> I really don't know what's happening.
>
>
> mehma sarja wrote :
>
>> I built 3.0.3 myself with no changes to source code. I am using postgresql
>> which I installed using a binary file - the Ubuntu install would not run
>> right.
>> Now to the question of amd vs intel. The processor is Intel 64 bit, I
>> think that's called amd64. I am on a Vmware esxi VM (Ubuntu 64 bit 9.0.4)
>>
>> Mehma
>> ===
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:21 AM, le dahut <le.da...@laposte.net <mailto:
>> le.da...@laposte.net>> wrote:
>>
>> A last question, are you sure that you're running a Ubuntu amd64
>> version and not just a x86 version on a 64bit hardware ?
>>
>>
>> mehma sarja wrote :
>>
>> I run dir and sd on ubuntu 9.0.4 amd64 using bacula 3.0.3 - no
>> problems.
>> Mehma
>> ===
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:12 AM, le dahut <le.da...@laposte.net
>> <mailto:le.da...@laposte.net> <mailto:le.da...@laposte.net
>>
>> <mailto:le.da...@laposte.net>>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> le dahut wrote :
>> >
>> > le dahut wrote :
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> I'm using bacula 3.0.3 on Ubuntu Hardy and I have a
>> strange problem.
>> >>
>> >> I cannot connect bacula-dir with bconsole.
>> >>
>> >
>> > I've some additional informations :
>> > * all iptables rules are flushed/erased, all policies are
>> on ACCEPT
>> > * hosts.allow and hosts.deny are OK
>> > * bacula-dir and bconsole are running on the same machine
>> (as it
>> appears
>> > with 127.0.0.1 in the debug log)
>> >
>> > With 'strace bconsole' the end of the debug is :
>> > """
>> > socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 3
>> > setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_KEEPALIVE, [1], 4) = 0
>> > connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(9101),
>> > sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 16) = 0
>> > setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_KEEPALIVE, [1], 4) = 0
>> > futex(0x7f695e5da584, 0x85 /* FUTEX_??? */, 1) = 1
>> > futex(0x7f695e5da540, 0x81 /* FUTEX_??? */, 1) = 1
>> > nanosleep({0, 100000}, NULL) = 0
>> > futex(0x7f695e5da584, 0x85 /* FUTEX_??? */, 1) = 1
>> > futex(0x7f695e5da540, 0x81 /* FUTEX_??? */, 1) = 1
>> > nanosleep({0, 100000}, NULL) = 0
>> > write(3, "\0\0\0\32Hello *UserAgent* calling\n", 30) = 30
>> > read(3,
>> > """
>> > and then nothing else, bconsole seems to wait for
>> bacula-dir to
>> answer
>>
>>
>> This bug occurs on amd64 only. Bacula on X86 runs well.
>>
>>
>> * The connection with bconsole to an amd64 DIRECTOR is
>> impossible
>>
>> * The connection from a x86 DIRECTOR to an amd64 SD fails
>> with "bad
>> password" (but the password are the same, the same conf file
>> runs on
>> x86)
>>
>> * The connection from a x86 DIRECTOR to as amd64 FD is OK =>
>> I can
>> backup if DIR and SD are on x86 and FD on amd64.
>>
>>
>> Did someone test bacula on amd64 ?
>> On Ubuntu/amd64 ? If yes, which version ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
