> Also my original intent in posing the "10 LTO4 tape" example, was > whether or not Bacula needed to read all previous tapes in a multi > archive set, in order to restore files residing on a given tape. > > It would appear that this is not the case and it would go directly to > the tape the files are stored on. >
I believe this does require you having a valid catalog however as I am not sure how well catalog recovery will go with the missing volume. John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users