> Also my original intent in posing the "10 LTO4 tape" example, was
> whether or not Bacula needed to read all previous tapes in a multi
> archive set, in order to restore files residing on a given tape.
>
> It would appear that this is not the case and it would go directly to
> the tape the files are stored on.
>

I believe this does require you having a valid catalog however as I am
not sure how well catalog recovery will go with the missing volume.

John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Search pays you back
Get the facts.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to