I have several mixed clients all backing up to Linux and Solaris SD's. The windows fileserver's are taking far too long, so in looking at this, I noticed the cpu utilization on the Windows FD's isn't very high but the SD are, why is that? Searching the forum showed compression is done at the FD level.
I first changed the network buffer with zero impact. I then made several backups turning off GZIP and SHA1 options in the fileset for ~27gig of data. GZIP and SHA1, speed averaged ~7800KB/s. No GZIP or SHA1, speed went up to ~30000KB/s Looking more closely at the FD, it appears to be single threaded and not really utilize the cpu very aggressively either. Is there anything that can be done here to help? Thanks! jlc ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
