On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Kevin Keane<subscript...@kkeane.com> wrote: > Daniel De Marco wrote: >> * Kevin Keane <subscript...@kkeane.com> [07/28/2009 21:51]: >> >>> I didn't follow this thread, but there is a simple solution to this >>> problem. You can generate the actual content of the file set with a >>> script, and call the same script from within both file sets in the >>> bacula configuration file. >>> >> >> Thanks, but in this case then the fileset would be the same and it would >> not solve the original problem. no? >> > As I said, I didn't follow the whole thread, so I don't really know what > the whole goal was. What I saw was that apparently you wanted to have > two separate file sets (with different names, obviously) that both > contain the exact same files - and needed a way to maintain it that way. > Basically, you would end up with two DIFFERENT filesets that just happen > to be exactly identical to each other. If I misunderstood that, I > apologize. Then my suggestion really isn't useful. >
The goal was to allow an a local and off-site backups of the same fileset to be independent. I remember that I did this in the past (years ago) that this worked if you created 2 jobs that contained the same fileset. Apparently in bacula 3.0.X this no longer works, so the need was to now create 2 jobs and 2 filesets. But the OP did not want the chance of the filesets to differ between the two jobs.. John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
