On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:23 AM, John Drescher<dresche...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:34 AM, terryc<ter...@woa.com.au> wrote: >> Silver Salonen wrote: >> >>> As one device supports only one job, you have to create separate devices for >>> each job you want to be able to run concurrently. >> >> That isn't how I understand it. I am working on having multiple clients >> feeding files into a single tape drive at the same time and expect that >> chuncks of each job will be interleaved along the tape. >> >> It should be the same for disk files, if that ishow you configure it >> (say one file for each nights jobs). >> > > As long as the pool is the same more than 1 job can concurrently write > to the same volume. I have been doing that for years with tape and > disk. However if you do want more than 1 pool then with disks its best > to have multiple storage devices. > I should have said more than 1 pool to operate concurrently with disk.
John M. Drescher -- John M. Drescher ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
