Hi Just need some clarification really. Have old Debian Sarge box, which need to be backed up. Now, directors I have are 2.4 or 3.0, with plans of migration to 3.0 all around. Debian box however have bacula client 1.36 in sarge archives. As it is only client, I would preffer to use distro packages, even if this gives me nothing in terms of manageability, as sarge is virtualy dead now. Now, director 3.0 gives me authentication error on connection. I've checked that names and password are correct. I'm assuming communication issue between 1.36 fd and 3.0 director. Am I right ?? Or such configuration is possible and I did typo (however, copy-pasted all details in config) ??
-- Piotr Gbyliczek Second Line Support Forlinux LTD -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. The information contained in this message or any of its attachments maybe confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of ForLinux Limited. ForLinux Limited email is for business use only. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
