Hi,
here is the configuration file.
Yesterday I blanked 2 tapes, and assignated one to a pool "Daily" and
one to the pool "Weekly". I ran btape fill and test with successs.
I then started full backup jobs of 12Gb in loop. Got that result:
Job A Daily, EOD 12GB ok
Job B Weekly, EOD 12GB ok
Job A Daily, EOD 24GB ok
Job B Weekly, EOD 24GB ok
Job A Daily, EOD 36GB ok
Job B Weekly, EOD 36GB ok
Job A Daily, Starting, unloading tape from JOB B and i got the "MTEOM"
error at this point. (Could not append to end of data)
08-May 09:16 setmseblx0007-sd JobId 181: Error: Unable to position to
end of data on device "IBMLTO4" (/dev/nst0): ERR=dev.c:1354 ioctl MTFSF
error on "IBMLTO4" (/dev/nst0). ERR=Input/output error.
This morning I updated the status of that volume from the console,
putting it to append again, and the job started and finished successfully !
There is a "sleep 60" after the load in my mtx-changer script, and a
"sleep 180" after the unload. Should be enough no ? when I do it
manually with "mtx" it takes something like 15 seconds.
Now the 4th "Job B" sent me the MTEOM error as well at the same position
on the tape.
Here is the configuration file :
Device {
Name = IBMLTO4
Media Type = LTO4
Device Type = tape
Archive Device = /dev/nst0
Autochanger = yes
#Changer Device = /dev/sg3
#Alert Command = "sh -c 'tapeinfo -f %c | grep -i tapealert'"
Label Type = IBM
Check Labels = yes
LabelMedia = No;
Random Access = No;
RandomAccess = No; # which one is the correct
syntax ?
AutomaticMount = yes; # when device opened, read it
RemovableMedia = yes;
AlwaysOpen = yes
Requires Mount = no;
#Maximum Job Spool Size = 2G # default is unlimited
#Spool Directory = "/export/shared/spool"
# things to try:
TWO EOF = No # tried but append test fails. default is No
#Offline On Unmount = no # default is No
Hardware End of Medium = no # default is Yes
BSF at EOM = No; # default is No
#Backward Space Record = no # default is Yes for
tape device
#Backward Space File = no #
# Use MTIOCGET = Yes # only need to no on
some ***BSD systems
Fast Forward Space File = no # tried, not better, got
MTFSF error
# This line required if above HEOM is
set to "No"
Volume Poll Interval = 300 # Poll the drive to seek the status
}
Autochanger {
Name = TL2000
Device = IBMLTO4
Changer Command = "/etc/bacula/scripts/mtx-changer %c %o %S %a %d"
Changer Device = /dev/sg3 # already set in the device resource. both
are possibles
}
Thank you all for your help !
Hayden Katzenellenbogen wrote:
> Yvan,
>
> Could you paste a copy of your bacula-sd.conf. The device and auto changer
> sections.
>
> I have found that if I load the tape into the drive then run the fill test it
> will not give the WEOF error, but when it loads the second tape it will give
> the WEOF error.
>
> If I have any other tape in the drive before I start and btape loads tape one
> for the fill test I get the WEOF error on both the first and second tape.
>
> The btape test runs 100% including the append test. Here is a snippet of the
> last fill test I ran. I had already loaded tape 1 into the drive before
> start. I also did an erase on both tapes using John's two mt commands.
>
> Also would it make a difference that I am running this on Ubuntu 8.0.4 LTS
> and using a fiber channel drive?
>
> H
>
> r...@archive:~/bacula/etc# ../bin/btape -c bacula-sd.conf /dev/nst0
> Tape block granularity is 1024 bytes.
> btape: butil.c:285 Using device: "/dev/nst0" for writing.
> 05-May 15:40 btape JobId 0: 3301 Issuing autochanger "loaded? drive 0"
> command.
> 05-May 15:40 btape JobId 0: 3302 Autochanger "loaded? drive 0", result is
> Slot 1.
> btape: btape.c:383 open device "Drive-1" (/dev/nst0): OK
> *fill
>
> This command simulates Bacula writing to a tape.
> It requires either one or two blank tapes, which it
> will label and write.
>
> If you have an autochanger configured, it will use
> the tapes that are in slots 1 and 2, otherwise, you will
> be prompted to insert the tapes when necessary.
>
> It will print a status approximately
> every 322 MB, and write an EOF every 3.2 GB. If you have
> selected the simple test option, after writing the first tape
> it will rewind it and re-read the last block written.
>
> If you have selected the multiple tape test, when the first tape
> fills, it will ask for a second, and after writing a few more
> blocks, it will stop. Then it will begin re-reading the
> two tapes.
>
> This may take a long time -- hours! ...
>
> Do you want to run the simplified test (s) with one tape
> or the complete multiple tape (m) test: (s/m) m
> Multiple tape test selected.
> Wrote Volume label for volume "TestVolume1".
> Wrote Start of Session label.
> 15:44:05 Begin writing Bacula records to first tape ...
> Wrote blk_block=5000, dev_blk_num=4999 VolBytes=322,495,488 rate=80623.9 KB/s
> Wrote blk_block=10000, dev_blk_num=9999 VolBytes=645,055,488 rate=92150.8 KB/s
> Wrote blk_block=15000, dev_blk_num=14999 VolBytes=967,615,488 rate=96761.5
> KB/s
> Wrote blk_block=20000, dev_blk_num=4499 VolBytes=1,290,175,488 rate=86011.7
> KB/s
> Wrote blk_block=25000, dev_blk_num=9499 VolBytes=1,612,735,488 rate=76796.9
> KB/s
> Wrote blk_block=30000, dev_blk_num=14499 VolBytes=1,935,295,488 rate=80637.3
> KB/s
>
>
> Wrote blk_block=13055000, dev_blk_num=15500 VolBytes=842,204,095,488
> rate=70625.1 KB/s
> 19:02:52 Flush block, write EOF
> Wrote blk_block=13060000, dev_blk_num=4000 VolBytes=842,526,655,488
> rate=70598.9 KB/s
> Wrote blk_block=13065000, dev_blk_num=9000 VolBytes=842,849,215,488
> rate=70608.1 KB/s
> Wrote blk_block=13070000, dev_blk_num=14000 VolBytes=843,171,775,488
> rate=70611.5 KB/s
> Wrote blk_block=13075000, dev_blk_num=3500 VolBytes=843,494,335,488
> rate=70603.0 KB/s
> Wrote blk_block=13080000, dev_blk_num=8500 VolBytes=843,816,895,488
> rate=70612.3 KB/s
> 05-May 19:03 btape JobId 0: End of Volume "TestVolume1" at 1226:13010 on
> device "Drive-1" (/dev/nst0). Write of 64512 bytes got -1.
> 05-May 19:03 btape JobId 0: Re-read of last block succeeded.
> btape: btape.c:2360 Last block at: 1226:13009 this_dev_block_num=13010
> btape: btape.c:2394 End of tape 1226:0. VolumeCapacity=844,107,844,608. Write
> rate = 70595.3 KB/s
> 05-May 19:03 btape JobId 0: End of medium on Volume "TestVolume1"
> Bytes=844,107,844,608 Blocks=13,084,509 at 05-May-2009 19:03.
> 05-May 19:03 btape JobId 0: 3307 Issuing autochanger "unload slot 1, drive 0"
> command.
> 05-May 19:04 btape JobId 0: 3301 Issuing autochanger "loaded? drive 0"
> command.
> 05-May 19:04 btape JobId 0: 3302 Autochanger "loaded? drive 0", result:
> nothing loaded.
> 05-May 19:04 btape JobId 0: 3304 Issuing autochanger "load slot 2, drive 0"
> command.
> 05-May 19:04 btape JobId 0: 3305 Autochanger "load slot 2, drive 0", status
> is OK.
> 05-May 19:04 btape: Fatal Error at dev.c:1705 because:
> dev.c:1704 Attempt to WEOF on non-appendable Volume
> Wrote Volume label for volume "TestVolume2".
> 05-May 19:04 btape JobId 0: Wrote label to prelabeled Volume "TestVolume2" on
> device "Drive-1" (/dev/nst0)
> 05-May 19:04 btape JobId 0: New volume "TestVolume2" mounted on device
> "Drive-1" (/dev/nst0) at 05-May-2009 19:04.
> Done writing 0 records ...
> Wrote End of Session label.
> Wrote state file last_block_num1=13009 last_block_num2=11
>
>
> 19:04:42 Done filling tapes at 0:13. Now beginning re-read of first tape ...
> 05-May 19:04 btape JobId 0: 3307 Issuing autochanger "unload slot 2, drive 0"
> command.
> 05-May 19:05 btape JobId 0: 3304 Issuing autochanger "load slot 1, drive 0"
> command.
> 05-May 19:05 btape JobId 0: 3305 Autochanger "load slot 1, drive 0", status
> is OK.
> 05-May 19:05 btape JobId 0: Ready to read from volume "TestVolume1" on device
> "Drive-1" (/dev/nst0).
> Rewinding.
> Reading the first 10000 records from 0:0.
> 10000 records read now at 1:5084
> Reposition from 1:5084 to 1226:13009
> Reading block 13009.
>
> The last block of the first tape matches.
>
> 05-May 19:06 btape JobId 0: 3307 Issuing autochanger "unload slot 1, drive 0"
> command.
> 05-May 19:07 btape JobId 0: 3304 Issuing autochanger "load slot 2, drive 0"
> command.
> 05-May 19:07 btape JobId 0: 3305 Autochanger "load slot 2, drive 0", status
> is OK.
> 05-May 19:07 btape JobId 0: Ready to read from volume "TestVolume2" on device
> "Drive-1" (/dev/nst0).
> Reposition from 0:0 to 0:1
> Reading block 1.
>
> The first block on the second tape matches.
>
> Reposition from 0:2 to 0:11
> Reading block 11.
>
> The last block on the second tape matches. Test succeeded.
>
> *
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: yvan [mailto:y...@skywalker.is-a-chef.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 6:15 AM
> To: Win Htin
> Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Tape MTEOM error with Dell TL2000 (IBM > TS3100)
>
> Hi !
>
> Yes, doing that at the moment. It takes a long time to reset all my
> tapes, erase them, and start some tests on them .... it takes days ...
> More to come soon ...
>
> By the way, what is the best way to erase a tape ? I tried a
> "dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/st0" but I had to stop it after 24h (maybe I
> should use bigger block size to increase speed ?)
> mt -f /dev/st0 erase gives me some error : Input/Ouput error after a few
> seconds...
>
> Le 05.05.2009 14:12, Win Htin a écrit :
>
>> Did you erase the tapes before re-running the backups?
>>
>> I would recommend first to completely erase the tape(s), run "btape"
>> to make sure everything is working fine and then start testing the
>> actual backups. Capture the output while running "btape" and go
>> through it line by line to make sure you don't have even a single
>> error.
>>
>> BTW, I forgot to mention I'm running Bacula version 2.2.6 on RHEL4 and
>> 2.4.3 on RHEL5.2.
>>
>> HTH,
>> Win
>>
>>
>>
>>> Message: 7
>>> Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 13:13:45 +0200
>>> From: yvan<y...@skywalker.is-a-chef.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Tape MTEOM error with Dell TL2000 (IBM
>>> TS3100)
>>> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> Message-ID:<49fecde9.8050...@skywalker.is-a-chef.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> thank you for the advices. We have very similar configurations, and I'm
>>> sure I'm not too far from the solution. I tried to use your settings in
>>> the storage daemon config file, and the "mt" options as well, than I
>>> didn't try so far.
>>>
>>> But, as soon as I put those settings, I have another error
>>>
>>> Hardware End of Medium = No # defaut is Yes
>>> Fast Forward Space File = No # This line required if above
>>>
>>> which is :
>>> 3-May 02:20 setmseblx0007-sd JobId 170: Error: Unable to position to end
>>> of data on device "IBMLTO4" (/dev/nst0): ERR=dev.c:1354 ioctl MTFSF
>>> error on "IBMLTO4" (/dev/nst0). ERR=Input/output error.
>>>
>>> Strange that it works for you then ... I issued all the "mt" commands
>>> you wrote. Tapeinfo gives me the samed infos as you have, but it's MTFSF
>>> error or MTEOM ...
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Yvan Broccard
>>>
>>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
> production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
> Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
> Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
> processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
