Hello Craig,
Craig Ringer wrote: > > Hi all > > I'm wondering if there's any way to limit the memory used by `accurate' > mode - say, by spooling the required data to an mmap()ped file instead > of an in-memory block, or handling it in chunks. > Not at this time, mmap isn't portable and it costs too much (you can do it yourself by adding an other swap area). We've planed a big memory improvement in a future release. Craig Ringer wrote: > > I just had a server with 2GB of RAM, most of which was free, go OOM > because Bacula ate 1.5GB of RAM and 2GB of swap during an incremental, > so I'm a bit concerned about this. > How many files have you on this server ? Bye PS: maybe you have already see my answer, something goes wrong with my first reply -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/OOM-with-%60accurate%27-mode-tp23331784p23402336.html Sent from the Bacula - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
