On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Andreas Thienemann <andr...@bawue.net> wrote: > On Sun, 19 Apr 2009, John Drescher wrote: > >> > But seriously, you're not going to tell me that the bacula-dir process is >> > going to need 2.6 GB of memory because of a few messages? >> > >> When I replied I did think of that. That is quite excessive, I was >> thinking thousands of messages but enough to equal 2.6GB would be way >> too many.. > > Exactly my thoughts. That would be excessive. > > I'm sure that bacula is keeping some state in memory and it's growing... > But it shouldn't be that much IMHO. >
This is probably a bug caused by a condition that is not tested by the developers very often if ever. I mean 230 jobs blocking for days waiting for user intervention. Not something that I would test often.. John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
