Hello, My data has become a bit unruly for my tapes. I am up to 7-8 tapes per full backup, which even with a tape changer is becoming a bit much. I am thinking of rotating hard drives instead, but was thinking maybe I would still use tapes for incremental, and maybe the occasional full. But then I realized that the compression option is attached to the FileSet. So, it seems that I have to make two FileSets that cover the same data, so that one FileSet is for the tape (no compression, let the hardware do it) and one for the drive. But, I think that would create a further problem, where every time it tried to do incremental for the tape, it would only find any backup done to tape, and do the incremental from that, rather than the more recent disk backup. Is there a way to get around this, or do I have something thought out wrong, or am I just stuck using all tape or all drives?
thanks, maria ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
