Hi, I have been doing bare metal restores, using bacula, of NT boxes, 2000 boxes, and 2003 boxes with some success. At this point, one of the roadblocks is the speed of restores. Some restores reach 24 MB/s , while others only reach around 1 MB/s. Using the backups from one particular box (it is a 2003 webserver) that restores around .7 to 1.5 MB/s , we have been running some tests to see if we can speed up restores. So far, we have had no luck.
One of the things we have tried is to restore to completely unused storage (to rule out I/O issues) Another thing we have tried is splitting the backups into 4 different filesets (they run about 20 gigs each in size). Does anyone have any suggestions for speeding up our restores? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Some-restores-slow%2C-some-restores-fast-tp22183059p22183059.html Sent from the Bacula - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
