> maybe try something like this, this is how i have storage configured in my 
> director config:
>
> # Definition of DDS tape storage device
> Storage {
>  Name = HP4048
>  SDPort = 9103
>  Media Type = LTO-4                  # must be same as MediaType in Storage 
> daemon
>  Autochanger = yes                   # enable for autochanger device
>  Device = LTO4-1
>  Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 4
> }
>
> Storage {
>  Name = LTO4-1
>  Address = krait                # N.B. Use a fully qualified name here
>  SDPort = 9103
>  Media Type = LTO-4                  # must be same as MediaType in Storage 
> daemon
>  Device = LTO4-1
>  Autochanger = yes                   # enable for autochanger device
>  Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 2
> }
> Storage {
>  Name = LTO4-2
>  Address = krait                # N.B. Use a fully qualified name here
>  SDPort = 9103
>  Media Type = LTO-4                  # must be same as MediaType in Storage 
> daemon
>  Device = LTO4-2
>  Autochanger = yes                   # enable for autochanger device
>  Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 2
> }
>

I have done similar in the past to force concurrency. I reset it back
to the autochanger resource now because I have multiple pools that I
run daily so there is not a lot of need for me to have the same pool
running on more than 1 drive. Like others suggested I believe the
"Prefer Mounted Volumes = no" is supposed to allow a pool to be loaded
in more than 1 drive however I have not tested this.

John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to