Dan Langille wrote: > On Jan 22, 2009, at 6:54 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote: > >> On Thursday 22 January 2009 23:59:26 Dan Langille wrote: >>> This sounds clever. Hard to do? >>> >> No, it is essentially the same a item 24 in the projects file. >> since it was >> 24 on the last vote, given the items above it, unfortunately we are >> unlikely >> to get to it any time soon, even though many of the items above it >> have >> already been completed for version 3.0.0 > > Is that the right number? 24? > > http://www.bacula.org/en/?page=projects > > Item 24: Add an override in Schedule for Pools based on backup types.
It looks like it's item 24 on the latest projects file: http://bacula.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bacula/trunk/bacula/projects?view=markup Perhaps the projects link on the main page should be updated to point to this version instead? -- Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu | For every problem, there is a solution that WPI Senior Network Engineer | is simple, elegant, and wrong. - HL Mencken GPG fingerprint = 6174 1257 129E 0D21 D8D4 E8A3 8E39 29E3 E2E8 8CEC ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
