On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Andriy Bandos <anb...@pitt.edu> wrote: > Sorry, did not get that. No problem. I know this is difficult to explain. Probably my fault here.
> Here is the specific example I asked about: > > user=30, md=5, case=6, reading=0; > There are two abnormalities (calc + mass) and three marks on each view (CC > and MLO). > One mark on each view corresponded to the calc-abnormality, and two marks > were "extra". Both "extra" marks and calc-abnormality on MLO-view have > Image=82, Cor_image=4; and both "extra" marks and calc-abnormality on > CC-view have Image=4, Cor_image=82. > So, to match there observations for two views additional (to > "Image"-"Cor_Image") information should be used. I thought you were using > "Mark" variable to complete matching, is it true? > Thanks. > Do you know the target size for this case? I am not sure what Amy sent you. John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
