Hi Bacula 2.4.x and SVN Version < 2.5.26 have performance problems for migration and copy jobs (in 2.5.x)
Especially when u run concurrent disk backup without spooling. I you have a second disk or raid array, use it for spooling on your disk backup jobs. This results in more continuous date in disk volumes. Migration rates will be better, but not optimal. This issue/bug is reported in http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1190 and most likely fixed in 2.5.26 Ulrich On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 14:17 -0500, J-P wrote: > Yes, the database is on the same drive which is a RAID0. > > > On 12/22/08 2:11 PM, "John Drescher" <dresche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:57 PM, J-P <jp...@videotron.ca> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Well, sorry I forgot to mention that somewhat important information, those > >> are migration from local disk to tape. Backups over the network are done at > >> around 7 - 10 MB/s rate. > >> > > I am definitely not a migration expert (never done any migration) but > > my guess is this is a database performance problem. Is the db on the > > same drive as the storage you are migrating from? Is the storage on a > > raid? > > > > John > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
