On Oct 8, 2008, at 1:11 PM, Joe Mannuzza wrote: > Dan Langille wrote: >> >> On Oct 2, 2008, at 1:54 PM, Joe Mannuzza wrote: >>> >>> Has anyone had issues doing a restore of large sets of data via >>> bacula? >>> Specifically, has anyone also noticed the process taxing the CPU? >> >> >> Can you be more specific regarding these processes? >> >> At what stage of the backup does the CPU get taxed? >> >> It is normal for the tree building phase to require lots of CPU >>
> Dan, > > Thanks for the response. I am unsure at what stage it gets bogged > down. Is there a way to check after the fact? Not that I can think of. > Also, there were many backups going on at the same time of the > failure- around 40. Server info: 2 Xeon 5150 @2.66 gigs, 3 gigs of > RAM. Is that normal? Do you usually run 40 concurrent backups? > > > Thanks, > > Joe > -- Dan Langille http://langille.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
