On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:55:45 -0500 "Robin Blanchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Finally got my scsi issues cleared up (I hope). Here's the intial btape > (bacula 2.2.8) (yes, mtx exchanger script is working, too) testing on > freebsd (releng_6). Does this look reasonable ? > > Wrote Volume label for volume "TestVolume1". > Wrote Start of Session label. > 15:50:58 Begin writing Bacula records to first tape ... > Wrote blk_block=5000, dev_blk_num=986 VolBytes=63,608,832 rate=63608.8 > KB/s > Wrote blk_block=10000, dev_blk_num=5986 VolBytes=386,168,832 > rate=55167.0 KB/s > Wrote blk_block=15000, dev_blk_num=10986 VolBytes=708,728,832 > rate=64429.9 KB/s > Wrote blk_block=20000, dev_blk_num=486 VolBytes=1,031,288,832 > rate=64455.6 KB/s > Wrote blk_block=25000, dev_blk_num=5486 VolBytes=1,353,848,832 > rate=54154.0 KB/s > Wrote blk_block=30000, dev_blk_num=10486 VolBytes=1,676,408,832 > rate=52387.8 KB/s Hi Robin, ~50-60 MB/s is what I see on the LTO-3 based bacula install I inherited. I believe that's regular performance. We use disk spooling in order to achieve that speed as the network is much slower. Regards, -- Alex Chekholko ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
