Timo Neuvonen schrieb: > Below are a few clips from my recent backup logs (2.2.7 on CentOS 5.1). This > has never been a big issue to me, so I haven't bothered me with the rate > values. But could someone advice me what causes the huge difference between > the transfer rate reported by storage daemon (the 1st line in each clip) and > the rate value reported by the director thereafter? > > The differences may be significant, eg. 696.5KB/s vs. 7.899MB/s. > Storage daemon values can be calculated from "SD bytes written" and "write > elapsed time", but what is the latter, smaller value from the director? > Since it is smaller, it cannot even be any occasional top peak value. > For example, in the first case elapsed time reported by the director (44:20) > and bytes written (17.8GB) would lead to value of appr. 6.7 MB/s, not to > 696.5 kB/s. > > > 18-Jan 17:36 dogbert-sd JobId 641: Job write elapsed time = 00:37:41, > Transfer rate = 7.899 M bytes/second > Elapsed time: 44 mins 20 secs > FD Bytes Written: 17,812,805,063 (17.81 GB) > SD Bytes Written: 17,861,799,431 (17.86 GB) > Rate: 696.5 KB/s [...]
It's a bug in 2.2.7 -> http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1036 Ralf ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
