felix, i too have noticed a severe performance degradation due to high load when i upgraded the backups server from 2.0.1 to 2.2.7. both sets of rpms came from the rpms-contrib-fschwarz repository on sourceforge.net.
were your rpms based on an --enable-batch-insert option to ./configure ? also, is there anything else that may be contributing to the severe performance hit? regards, mike Michael Nelson wrote: > Dan Langille wrote: > >> On 15 Aug 2007 at 15:27, Michael Nelson wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hmmmm. >>> >>> I got 2.2 installed here from source, and was expecting to see the big >>> performance gains I had heard about. Strangely, at least in my >>> application, 2.2 seems to be /significantly slower/ than 2.02. >>> >>> >> Did you specify --enable-batch-insert on your configuration? I found >> that in ReleaseNotes. >> >> > > Arrgggh. No. I have recompiled it now with that switch but it's off > running a long job so I will install the new version with batch-insert > when it is done. > > Thanks > Michael > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
