Am Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:50:50 +0100 schrieb Eric Bollengier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> > But this bug renders the incremental backups (almost) useless... > >> > >> This is not a bug at all. This is a common characteristic of many > >> backup systems. > > > > well, ok, > > > > this limitation renders the incremental backups (almost) useless. > > Why not run a command like 'find . -type f > file_list' and store the > result in a file before the backup ? (It will work better with a > snapshot) > > You will be aware of all "current" files... > > Bye Bingo! That's it. At least for unix-based systems it will work... ... make a list, and then do "recover" and give the filelist to bacula... Mit freundlichen Grüßen Vladimirs Vecgailis Geschäftsführer --- RedStar IT - Linux Consulting, Support, Hosting Inhaber Vladimirs Vecgailis Storkower Str. 225 10367 Berlin Tel. +49 30 97994649 Fax. +49 30 484986540 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WEB: http://www.redstar-it.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
