Vladimirs Vecgailis wrote: >>> But this bug renders the incremental backups (almost) useless... >> This is not a bug at all. This is a common characteristic of many >> backup systems. > > well, ok, > > this limitation renders the incremental backups (almost) useless.
I can see why you think that. Other will disagree. With heavily changing file systems, a full backup is your best solution. There is a project to achieve what you want. To date, nobody has done the work. >> BTW: when posting to a public mailing list, your huge signature is >> rather bulky and inappropriate. It is certainly not confidental. If >> you can spare us the legal blurb on each post, it would be appreciated: >> > np. Thank you. :) -- Dan Langille BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference : http://www.bsdcan.org/ PGCon - The PostgreSQL Conference: http://www.pgcon.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
