Hello,

On Jan/03/2008, Landon Fuller wrote:
>
> On Jan 3, 2008, at 05:19, Carles Pina i Estany wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a short question. I only wonder if someone is using it or not
>> (so, if Bacula supports it or doesn't support). We made some tests and
>> we couldn't do but we will re-test.
>>
>> Question is: is it possible to cypher the data in bacula-fd (client), and
>> this bacula-fd has only access to his public key? NOT the private key?
>>
>> My wish is this process:
>> -Generate public+private key in a secure computer
>> -Copy the public key to bacula-fd computer
>> -Copy the private key to some other place
>
> The file daemon configuration code currently requires that at least one 
> private key be present -- changing this would be a relatively small patch.
> The crypto implementation shouldn't make (m)any assumptions about key 
> availability, so I believe the config change should be sufficient.

Ok!

> If you've any interest in tackling this, I can provide some pointers, 
> otherwise I can try to get around to it sometime next week.

I would like (love) to have it, but is not urgent or necessary. My
schedule (in work time and free time) is full for at least one month, so
I prefer that you try to get around it next week (or whenever you can).

If you need some basic testing in different environment we can help a
bit on it.

Thanks you very much,

-- 
Carles Pina i Estany            GPG id: 0x8CBDAE64
        http://pinux.info       Manresa - Barcelona

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to